Actualité | Bourses, formations
Sur la formation des économistes et la crise du crédit
Ceci est un message de Geoffrey M. Hodgson, transmis à l'AFHE par Philippe Minard. Lire le texte de la lettre ici.
In November 2008 the Queen asked why so few Economists had foreseen the credit crunch.
Ten leading British Economists write to Her Majesty, claiming that the training of economists is too narrow: “Mathematical technique should not dominate real-world substance.”
During a visit to the London School of Economics in November 2008, the Queen asked why few economists had foreseen the credit crunch. Dated 22 July 2009, she received an answer from Professors Tim Besley and Peter Hennessy. This was widely quoted in the British press.
Ten leading British economists – including academics from top universities, three Academicians of the Academy of Social Sciences, academic journal editors, a former member of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission and the Chief Economic Advisor the Greater London Authority – have responded by writing their own response to the Queen. They note that the letter by Professors Besley and Hennessy fails to consider any deficiency in the training of economists themselves.
Following similar complaints by Nobel Laureates Ronald Coase, Wassily Leontief and Milton Friedman, the ten economists argue that economists has become largely transformed into a branch of applied mathematics, with little contact with the real world. The letter by Professors Besley and Hennessy does not consider how the preference for mathematical technique over real-world substance diverted many economists from looking at the whole picture.
The ten economists uphold that the narrow training of economists – which concentrates on mathematical techniques and the building of empirically uncontrolled formal models – has been a major reason for the failure of the economics profession to give adequate warnings of the economic crises in 2007 and 2008.
The ten signatories also point out that while Professors Besley and Hennessy complain that economists have become overly ‘charmed by the market’, they mention neither the highly questionable belief in universal ‘rationality’ nor the ‘efficient markets hypothesis’, which are both widely taught and promoted by mainstream economists.
The ten economists call for a broader training of economists, involving allied disciplines such as psychology and economic history, as well as mathematics.
For more information please contact:
Professor Geoffrey M. Hodgson
The Business School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB
Document(s) à télécharger
Rubriques à consulter
- Bourses de recherche « histoire de l'assurance »
- Offres closes, pour mémoire
- Bourse de recherche en histoire du Comité d’histoire d'Altadis "Seita, terres d'histoire"
- Bourse de recherche Société Générale
- Résultats de la 11e édition du prix d’histoire François Bourdon “Techniques, entreprises et société industrielle”
- Sur la formation des économistes et la crise du crédit
- Bourses d'études de l'Association pour l'histoire des chemins de fer 2010-2011
- Lancement de la quatrième édition du Prix Crédit Agricole d'histoire des entreprises, organisé en partenariat avec la revue Entreprises et histoire
- Fondation EDF Diversiterre, bourses d'études 2010-2011
- Histoire de la dentelle – bourses d'étude
- 13e Prix d'histoire François Bourdon "techniques, entreprises, société industrielle
- L'Europe et l'invention de la modernité
- Prix Crédit Agricole d'histoire des entreprises, édition 2010
- Bourses d’études universitaires de l'Association pour l’histoire des télécommunications et de l’informatique
- Prix de thèse de la Société française d’histoire urbaine
- Bourses d'études 2011-2012 de l'Association pour l'histoire des chemins de fer en France
- Poste de professeur-e ordinaire en histoire économique à l'Université de Genève